4.2 Article

A STUDY ON SCAN SPEED RELATIONSHIP WITH MICROSTRUCTURAL EVOLUTION, PHASE COMPOSITION AND MICROHARDNESS OF Ni-CONTAINING INTERMETALLIC COATINGS ON Ti-6Al-4V USING LASER CLADDING TECHNIQUE

期刊

SURFACE REVIEW AND LETTERS
卷 25, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0218625X19500355

关键词

Laser; microstructure; hardness; intermetallics and phase composition

资金

  1. National Laser Centre (NLC), Council of scientific and industrial research (CSIR), Pretoria, South Africa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Titanium alloys have been used for variety of engineering applications but their relatively low hardness and low thermal conductivity are shortcomings that have reduced their potential use. In this work, attempts have been made to study the effects of laser scanning speed and admixed fraction of reinforced Ni-Co powders on clad layer formation and its corresponding properties on Ti-6Al-4V. Laser power of 750 W, beam size of 3 mm with argon shield gas flow rate of 1.2 L/min was made constant, while the powders were premixed and deposited on Ti-6Al-4V with varying compositions at different scanning speeds of 0.6 and 1.2 m/min. The microstructural analysis, phase constituents and hardness properties of Ni-Co intermetallics reinforced dads were also examined. The morphology of the resultant coatings was analyzed using X-ray diffractometry (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) equipped with energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS). The research results showed that laser cladding coatings displayed enhanced properties such as fine microstructure and good metallurgical bonding with the substrate containing minimal pores with respect to the substrate. Furthermore, the microstructure revealed the formation of various fractions of interdendritic compounds/intermetallics dispersed within the coating matrix which could be responsible for the increased hardness obtained. The average hardness of the coating was about 856 HV0.1, which was about 2.5 times that of the substrate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据