4.7 Article

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy evaluation on the protective properties of epoxy/DBSAdoped polyaniline-TiO2 nanocomposite coated mild steel under cathodic polarization

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 331, 期 -, 页码 66-76

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.10.043

关键词

Epoxy; DBSA doped PANI; TiO2 nanoparticles; Mild steel; Cathodic protection; EIS

资金

  1. Iranian National Committee of Nanotechnology in Ministry of Science, Research and Technology
  2. Office of Vice Chancellor in Charge of Research of University of Tabriz

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dodecyle benzene sulphonic acid doped polyaniline (DBSA doped PANI) and dodecyle benzene sulphonic acid doped polyaniline-TiO2 (DBSA doped PANI-TiO2) nanocomposite were synthesized via in situ oxidative polymerization and characterized by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, ThermoGravimetric/differential ThermoGravimetric analysis (TGA/DTA), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive Xray spectroscopy (EDX). The protective properties of epoxy/DBSA doped PAM and epoxy/DBSA doped PANI-TiO2 coated mild steel were evaluated by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in NaCl 3.5 wt% at 65 degrees C with and without cathodic protection (CP). Cathodic protection was applied at - 500, - 750, - 1000, - 1250 and -1500 mV vs. Ag/AgCl. The application of cathodic protection at more negative potentials than - 750 mV affected the performance of the both coatings causing the decreasing of coating resistance (R-coat). The coating resistance of epoxy/DBSA doped PANI and epoxy/DBSA doped PANI-TiO2 are in the order of 1 x 10(4) Omega cm(2) and 1 x 10(5) Omega cm(2), respectively. Accordingly, the coating capacitance and water uptake of epoxy/DBSA doped PANI is greater than epoxy/DBSA doped PANI-TiO2 at whole applied potentials. The protective performance of epoxy/DBSA doped PANI coating is improved in the presence of TiO2 nanoparticles under different cathodic potentials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据