4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Artificial neural network modeling and sensitivity analysis for soiling effects on photovoltaic panels in Morocco

期刊

SUPERLATTICES AND MICROSTRUCTURES
卷 127, 期 -, 页码 139-150

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.spmi.2017.12.037

关键词

Solar energy; Soiling effect; Solar PV glass; ANN application; PAWN sensitivity analysis

资金

  1. Moroccan Research Institute IRESEN (Institut de Recherche en Energie Solaire et Energies Nouvelles)
  2. CONACYT-SENER project [254667]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present work, an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) methodology for studying and modeling the soiling effect on solar photovoltaic (PV) glass is presented. To perform the study, a solar PV glazing was exposed outdoor at the home solar energy platform of Physic of Semi-conductors and Solar Energy research structure (PSES) at Mohammed V University in Rabat, Morocco. Regular measurements from April 20, to December 31, 2016, were carried out to monitor the soiling rate changes over time. Meteorological data were used as input variables for ANN modeling. The model performance was evaluated using a statistical comparison between experimental and simulated values. Results show that the implementation of Levenberg-Marquardt backpropagation algorithm, and the active functions Tansig, and Purline achieve the best estimations (R-2 = 0.928) in an ANN architecture 6-35-1. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis approach was employed to determine the effect of input parameters on model output and the behavior of the model with the variation of each input parameter. Sensitivity analysis results indicate that the most influential parameter for PV soiling rate was the relative humidity, followed by wind direction. The ANN model coupled with sensitivity analysis show be a promising framework for its application in smart sensors on cleaning systems for PV modules to improve their operational efficiency. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据