4.7 Article

In Situ Coupling FeM (M = Ni, Co) with Nitrogen-Doped Porous Carbon toward Highly Efficient Trifunctional Electrocatalyst for Overall Water Splitting and Rechargeable Zn-Air Battery

期刊

ADVANCED SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS
卷 1, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adsu.201700020

关键词

FeNi; multifunctional electrocatalysts; nitrogen doping; overall water splitting; Zn-air batteries

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0100100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21471146, 51401084]
  3. Jiangsu Province Basic Research Program [BK20140267]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M591498]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), oxygen evolution reaction (OER), and oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) are crucial for water splitting and fuel cells/metal-air batteries, of which the benchmark catalysts for HER/ORR and OER are expensive and scarce Pt-based and Ir/Ru-based compounds, respectively. In spite of this, no trifunctional electrocatalyst for HER, OER, and ORR with an acceptable performance have been reported. In response, herein, as a proof-of-concept experiment, this study first in situ couples element abundant FeM (M = Ni, Co) particles with the nitrogen-doped porous carbon (NPC) by a facile and scalable strategy. Unexpectedly, the resulted FeM/NPC exhibits superior trifunctional catalytic activities for HER, OER, and ORR even in the same electrolyte, which can be attributed to the synergistic advantages of FeM/NPC in terms of its good conductivity, highly porous structure, high Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area, nitrogen doping, and the intimate contact of FeM and NPC. Furthermore, such trifunctional catalyst makes the overall water splitting work at moderate overpotential, and endows the assembled Zn-air battery with a good performance and impressive capacity to self-power the overall water splitting, demonstrating its feasibility for practical application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据