4.3 Article

Exploring fundamental differences between red- and blue-shifted intramolecular hydrogen bonds using FAMSEC, FALDI, IQA and QTAIM

期刊

STRUCTURAL CHEMISTRY
卷 28, 期 5, 页码 1429-1444

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11224-017-0956-5

关键词

Intramolecular hydrogen bond; FALDI; FAMSEC; Chemical bond; Deformation density; Interacting quantum fragments

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of South Africa [105855]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have discovered, using developed by us recently FALDI and FAMSEC computational techniques, fundamentally distinct mechanisms of intramolecular red- and blue-shifted H-bond formation that occurred in different conformers of the same molecule (amino-acid beta-alanine) involving the same heteroatoms (O-H center dot center dot center dot N and N-H center dot center dot center dot O). Quantitative topological, geometric and energetic data of both H-bonds obtained with well-known QTAIM and IQA methodologies agree with what is known regarding H-bonding in general. However, the FALDI charge and decomposition scheme for calculating in real space 3D conformational deformation densities provided clear evidence that the process of electron density redistribution taking place on the formation of the stronger red-shifted H-bond is fundamentally distinct from the weaker blue-shifted H-bond. Contributions made by atoms of the X-H center dot center dot center dot Y-Z fragment (IUPAC notation) as well as distinct atoms on the H-bond formation were fully explored. The FAMSEC energy decomposition approach showed that the atoms involved in formation of the red-shifted H-bond interact in a fundamentally different fashion, both locally and with the remainder of the molecule, as compared with those of the blue-shifted H-bond. Excellent correlations of trends obtained with QTAIM, IQA, FAMSEC and FALDI techniques were obtained. Commentary regarding IUPAC recommended definition of an H-bond and validity of observed AILs (or bond paths) of the two H-bond kinds is also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据