3.8 Article

Divergent growth response of Qinghai spruce to recent climate warming in the arid northeastern Tibet Plateau

期刊

ASIAN GEOGRAPHER
卷 34, 期 2, 页码 169-181

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10225706.2017.1394886

关键词

Tree rings; Qinghai spruce; Northeastern Tibetan Plateau; Divergent growth response; climate warming

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [41405081]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region [2017D01B55]
  3. Excellent Youth Science and Technology Innovation Personnel Training Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region [qn2015yx040]
  4. Young Talent Training Plan of Meteorological Departments of China Meteorological Administration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Divergent responses of tree growth to climate change have been widely reported from the high altitude forests of the Northern Hemisphere. Here, we developed tree-ring width (TRW) and maximum latewood density (MXD) chronologies for the Qinghai spruce (Picea crassifolia) from three sites (DHS, XXG, and TLC) with different hydrothermal conditions in the arid northeastern Tibetan Plateau, and we used these chronologies to observe climategrowth relationships and divergent growth responses of the Qinghai spruce. Cross correlations showed highly significant divergences among the TRW and MXD chronologies. Precipitation was most strongly related to TRW in different spruce trees. At the upper treeline site (XXG) and at the relatively wet site (TLC), where growth was limited by temperature, MXD showed similar growth trends over time. At the dry site (DHS), TRW showed a strong drought stress signal over time, and MXD lost sensitivity to temperature variations. We would like to highlight the necessity for additional studies investigating possible non-stationary growth responses of trees that are experiencing climate warming, especially for studies of MXD at dry sites that are used for temperature reconstruction in arid areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据