期刊
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN
卷 129, 期 -, 页码 3-11出版社
ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.10.012
关键词
healthcare; quality improvement; shared decision-making; Choosing Wisely; guidelines
The question of how to improve healthcare quality and the need for patient empowerment and shared decision-making has been the subject of political and scientific debate for years. In addition to various quality initiatives, top lists summarizing selected recommendations to increase awareness of overuse, spread by means of public campaigns, has become popular on the international level - known as the Choosing Wisely initiative. However, the trustworthiness of top lists, their impact on patient-relevant outcomes, their role in and integration into the context of the various pre-existing approaches to improve healthcare quality and the effects of neglecting under- and misuse are not clear. On the other hand, top lists may provide new opportunities to improve awareness and dissemination of carefully selected recommendations based on high-quality guidelines. Therefore, the Association of Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) has established an ad hoc commission to design a system-specific initiative. The commission has the task to clarify goals, methods of development and concepts for implementation and evaluation, to address concerns and to build upon specific existing resources - e. g., the established quality management system for guidelines in Germany. The key goals defined by the commission include the systematization of the dialogue between healthcare practitioners and patients and the promotion of ethically founded decision-making as an answer to an increasing economic orientation of the healthcare system. To ensure the methodological quality of specific recommendations, the commission has developed a manual. To the best of our knowledge, this manual is the first detailed method paper aiming to guide developers of Choosing Wisely recommendations. More than 20 German medical scientific societies have already addressed the subject of top lists.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据