3.8 Proceedings Paper

Investigation of the Effects of Buried Object Orientation in Subsurface Target Detection by GPR

出版社

IEEE

关键词

ground penetrating radar (G'PR); time frequency representations (TER); Page Distribution; target detection; feature extraction; cumulative energy curve

资金

  1. Middle East Technical University (ODTU) [BAP-03-01-2016-005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Use of ultra-widehand ground penetrating radars (GPRs) have been the most effective approach in subsurface target detection. Proper preprocessing, prescreening, feature extraction, classification and fusion techniques are all needed to satisfy the requirements of high detection probability and low false alarm rates, simultaneously. Dominating ground reflection signals and soil clutter effects including the randomly varying non-planar ground surfaces, inhomogeneous soil nature, pebbles or rocks within the soil, moisture level of the soil and various garbage items in the soil environment are all well-known and broadly-studied problems in the GPR-based target detection and recognition. An additional source of difficulty in this problem is the arbitrary orientations of the buried objects, which may lead to incorrect classification results, and hence increased false alarm rates. In this paper, we will first simulate down-looking GPR signals for cylindrical targets, which are made of perfect electric conductor (PEC) or plastic, buried in soil in different orientations with respect to the air-ground surface. Then, we will remove the dominating ground reflections from the raw data by a suitable preprocessing technique to facilitate the detection of buried objects. Finally, target features will be extracted in the two dimensional temporal-spectral domain by using the Page distribution (PD), which is an energetic time-frequency representation (TFR) technique. The aim of this paper is to investigate the variations in the GPR signals and also in the extracted target features due to changes in the orientations of buried targets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据