4.6 Article

The pathologic mechanisms underlying lumbar distraction spinal cord injury in rabbits

期刊

SPINE JOURNAL
卷 17, 期 11, 页码 1665-1673

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.05.024

关键词

Corrosion casts; Distraction; Ink perfusion; Microvessels; Pathologic mechanisms; Spinal cord injury

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81171741]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: A reliable experimental rabbit model of distraction spinal cord injury (SCI) was established to successfully simulate gradable and replicable distraction SCI. However, further research is needed to elucidate the pathologic mechanisms underlying distraction SCI. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the pathologic mechanisms underlying lumbar distraction SCI in rabbits. STUDY DESIGN: This is an animal laboratory study. METHODS: Using a self-designed spine distractor, the experimental animals were divided into a control group and 10%, 20%, and 30% distraction groups. Pathologic changes to the spinal cord microvessels in the early stage of distraction SCI were identified by perfusion of the spinal cord vasculature with ink, production of transparent specimens, observation by light microscopy, and observation of corrosion casts of the spinal cord microvascular architecture by scanning electron microscopy. Malondialdehyde (MDA) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) concentrations in the injured spinal cord tissue were measured after 8 hours. RESULTS: With an increasing degree and duration of distraction, the spinal cord microvessels were only partially filled and had the appearance of spasm until rupture and hemorrhage were observed. The MDA concentration increased and the SOD concentration decreased in the spinal cord tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Changes to the internal and external spinal cord vessels led to spinal cord ischemia, which is a primary pathologic mechanism of distraction SCI. Lipid peroxidation mediated by free radicals took part in secondary pathologic damage of distraction SCI. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据