4.5 Article

Determination of cut-off cycle threshold values in routine RT-PCR assays to assist differential diagnosis of norovirus in children hospitalized for acute gastroenteritis

期刊

EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION
卷 143, 期 15, 页码 3292-3299

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S095026881500059X

关键词

Caliciviruses; diarrhoea; estimating disease prevalence; gastrointestinal infections; modelling

资金

  1. National Foundation for Science and Technology Development [106.03-2010.56]
  2. Japan Initiative for Global Research Network on Infectious Diseases
  3. 'Biodiversity and Infectious Diseases in Southeast Asia' CNRS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Norovirus (NV) is an important cause of acute gastroenteritis in children, but is also frequently detected in asymptomatic children, which complicates the interpretation of NV detection results in both the clinical setting and population prevalence studies. A total of 807 faecal samples from children aged <5 years hospitalized for acute gastroenteritis were collected in Thai Binh, Vietnam, from January 2011 to September 2012. Real-time RT-PCR was used to detect and quantify NV-RNA in clinical samples. A bimodal distribution of cycle threshold (C-t) values was observed in which the lower peak was assumed to represent cases for which NV was the causal agent of diarrhoea, whereas the higher peak was assumed to represent cases involving an alternative pathogen other than NV. Under these assumptions, we applied finite-mixture modelling to estimate a threshold of C-t <2136 (95% confidence interval 2029-2246) to distinguish NV-positive patients for which NV was the likely cause of diarrhoea. We evaluated the validity of the threshold through comparisons with NV antigen ELISA results, and comparisons of C-t values in patients co-infected with rotavirus. We conclude that the use of an appropriate cut-off value in the interpretation of NV real-time RT-PCR results may improve differential diagnosis of enteric infections, and could contribute to improved estimates of the burden of NV disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据