3.8 Proceedings Paper

EDDIE: EM-Based Detection of Deviations in Program Execution

出版社

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3079856.3080223

关键词

Hardware Security; EM Emanation; Malware Detection; Internet-of-Things

资金

  1. NSF [1563991, 1318934]
  2. DARPA LADS [FA8650-16-C-7620]
  3. AFOSR [FA9550-14-1-0223]
  4. Division Of Computer and Network Systems
  5. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1318934] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper describes EM-Based Detection of Deviations in Program Execution (EDDIE), a new method for detecting anomalies in program execution, such as malware and other code injections, without introducing any overheads, adding any hardware support, changing any software, or using any resources on the monitored system itself. Monitoring with EDDIE involves receiving electromagnetic (EM) emanations that are emitted as a side effect of execution on the monitored system, and it relies on spikes in the EM spectrum that are produced as a result of periodic (e.g. loop) activity in the monitored execution. During training, EDDIE characterizes normal execution behavior in terms of peaks in the EM spectrum that are observed at various points in the program execution, but it does not need any characterization of the malware or other code that might later be injected. During monitoring, EDDIE identifies peaks in the observed EM spectrum, and compares these peaks to those learned during training. Since EDDIE requires no resources on the monitored machine and no changes to the monitored software, it is especially well suited for security monitoring of embedded and IoT devices. We evaluate EDDIE on a real IoT system and in a cycle-accurate simulator, and find that even relatively brief injected bursts of activity (a few milliseconds) are detected by EDDIE with high accuracy, and that it also accurately detects when even a few instructions are injected into an existing loop within the application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据