4.5 Article

Chemical composition and toxicological evaluation of Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poiteau (LAMIACEAE) in Drosophila melanogaster and Artemia salina

期刊

SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
卷 113, 期 -, 页码 437-442

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2017.10.003

关键词

Drosophila melanogaster; Artemia salina; Essential oil; Infusion; Bamburral

资金

  1. PIBIC-URCA Fellowship
  2. TWAS-CNPq
  3. CAPES
  4. CNPq

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poiteau, known as Bamburral is a plant widely used in Brazilian folk medicine, however, there are no toxicological studies to ascertain its safety. Thus, we aimed to investigate the phytochemical and toxic effects of essential oil and infusion of the dry leaves of H. suaveolens in Drosophilamelanogaster and Artermia salina. The chemical composition of the essential oil was performed by CG-MS, while that of the infused extract was analyzed byHPLC-DAD. The toxicity of the essential oil-OE (3.03-30.3 mu g/mL air) to D. melanogaster was performed by means of volatilization; and for infusion (2.5-20 mg/mL), they were submitted to ingestion and then submitted to locomotive activity by means of negative geotaxis. However, for acute toxicity, A. salina cysts were exposed for 24 h to the tested samples (10-1000 mu g/mL). Our results demonstrated that OE had threemajor components: beta-Caryophyllene (18.57%), sabinene (15.99%) and spathulenol (11.09%) while the leaf infusion showed caffeic acid as the major component (12.76 mg/g). H. suaveolens leaves infusionwas not toxic to the organisms at all the concentrations tested (p > 0.05). However, OE behaved as quite toxicwith LC50 of 15.5 and 49.72 mu g/mL in D. melanogaster and A. salina, respectively. In addition, OE caused impairment of the locomotor behavior of flies. Therefore, our study indicates that more caution should be taken regarding the dosage and frequent use of H. suaveolens leaf essential oil. (C) 2017 SAAB. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据