3.8 Proceedings Paper

Energetic and visual comfort implications of using perovskite-based building-integrated photovoltaic glazings

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.256

关键词

Building-integrated photovoltaics; energy performance; energy simulation

资金

  1. Action - Cohesion and Development Fund - APQ Research Puglia Region Regional programme supporting smart specialization and social and environmental sustainability - FutureInResearch.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Building integration of photovoltaics (BIPVs) has been recognized worldwide as a pivotal technology enabling the exploitation of innovative renewable energy sources in buildings, acting as electric power generators within the new framework of smart cities. Photovoltaic (PV) modules can be designed as relevant components of building envelopes, energy-producing units, fulfilling the multiple requirements of construction elements. Their integration in architectural glazings is still impeded by the inherent optical features of commercial solar cells, but also aesthetic, economic and social constraints, still acting as relevant barriers. In this roadmap, novel PV technologies could be effective drivers of a real change of paradigm. We have recently demonstrated that a coherent and exhaustive study of BIPV for semitransparent cells requires a holistic approach, taking into account the complex fallouts of semitransparent modules on the energy balance, but also the full assessment of visual comfort benefits deriving from their integration in glazings. We have demonstrated that BIPV could offer manifold advantages: visual comfort effects comparable to commercially available solar control glasses and fair energy yield. Moreover, we found that in several cases the annual energy production overcomes the amount of electric energy used for artificial lighting. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the 72nd Conference of the Italian Thermal Machines Engineering Association

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据