4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Recent insights into boron-oxygen related degradation: Evidence of a single defect

期刊

SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS
卷 173, 期 -, 页码 25-32

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.06.038

关键词

Boron-oxygen; Czochralski silicon; Light-induced degradation; Carrier-induced degradation

资金

  1. Australian Government through the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA)
  2. Australian Center for Advanced Photovoltaics (ACAP)
  3. Norwegian Research Centre for Solar Cell Technology
  4. REC Wafer, REC Solar, Elkem Solar
  5. Norwegian Research Council through the KMB
  6. ARENA [1-A060]
  7. UK Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

c Fast and slow boron-oxygen related degradation in p-type Czochralski silicon is often attributed to two separate defects due to the different time constants and the determination of different capture cross section ratios (k). However, recent work has suggested the possible involvement of a single defect [1,2]. This study reviews recent evidence, and provides further evidence/analysis to demonstrate the involvement of a single defect, in four key areas: 1) Identical recombination properties in the fast and slow timescales [1]; 2) The ability to describe a multi-stage degradation of carrier lifetime with a single recombination active defect [1]; 3) The possible involvement of interstitial iron in accounting for higher apparent capture cross-section ratios during early stages of boron oxygen related degradation and recombination with a high capture cross-section ratio remaining after permanent deactivation; 4) The ability to modulate the fraction of fast and slow degradation by thermal annealing without modulating the total extent of degradation or recombination properties [2]. A revised parameterisation of the B-O related recombination is also presented, which suggests a stronger influence of acceptor-level related recombination than has been previously reported.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据