4.7 Article

Dynamic characterization of a biogenic sand with a resonant column of fixed-partly fixed boundary conditions

期刊

SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING
卷 95, 期 -, 页码 180-187

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.01.042

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dynamic properties of sands, including the small-strain shear modulus and the small-to-medium strain shear modulus (G) and shear damping (D,) have been examined extensively in the literature. However, most works published over the past decades have focused on the behavior of soils subjected to isotropic stress paths. In the present study, the dynamic properties of a biogenic sand with origin from Western Australia were examined in the laboratory using a resonant column of fixed-partly fixed boundary conditions. This configuration allows the study of the small-strain shear modulus, the strain-dependent modulus and shear damping of samples subjected to stress anisotropy, which stress conditions may represent more effectively the in-situ state of a soil. For this purpose, proper calibrations of the resonant column were carried out in order to capture the rotational inertia of the apparatus in a wide range of cyclic frequencies covering, in this way, typical resonant frequencies of real soil samples. Basic geotechnical characterization of the biogenic sand was carried out quantifying the shape of the grains and conducting a series of monotonic triaxial tests capturing the peak and critical state friction angles. The dynamic test results indicated a more pronounced effect of the stress anisotropy on Gin of the biogenic sand in comparison to the corresponding effect on quartz sands reported in the literature. For the limited set of experiments conducted in the study, the effect of stress anisotropy was found less pronounced for the small-to-medium strain shear modulus and shear damping, even though the results indicated a marked drop of shear damping at small strains when the samples were subjected to a deviatoric compressive load.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据