4.7 Article

SoilChip-XPS integrated technique to study formation of soil biogeochemical interfaces

期刊

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 113, 期 -, 页码 71-79

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.05.021

关键词

Lab on a chip; Mollisol; Oxisol; Soil biogeochemical interface; SoilChip; X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41522107, 41430860]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB15020401]
  3. Youth Innovation Team Project of ISA, CAS [2017QNCXTD_GTD]
  4. Recruitment Program of High-End Foreign Experts of the State Administration of Foreign Experts Affairs [GDT20154300073]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many soil functions are modulated by processes at soil biogeochemical interfaces (BGIs). However, characterizing the elemental dynamics at BGIs is hampered by the heterogeneity of soil microenvironments. In order to investigate the processes of BGI formation in an upland soil (Mollisol) and a paddy soil (Oxisol), we developed a SoilChip method by assembling dispersed soil particles onto homogeneous 800 mu m-diameter microarray chips and then submerging them in a solution that contained dissolved organic matter (OM) extracted from one of the two soils. The chips with Mollisol particles were incubated at 95-100% humidity, whereas the chips with Oxisol particles were incubated at 100% humidity. Dynamics of individual elements at the soils' BGIs were quantitatively determined using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Distinct differences in the soil-microbe complexes and elemental dynamics between the Mollisol and Oxisol BGIs suggested that the formation of specific BGIs resulted from the complex interaction of physical, chemical, and microbial processes. By integrating the SoilChip and XPS, it was possible to elucidate the dynamic formation of the two different soil BGIs under standardized conditions. Therefore, the SoilChip method is a promising tool for investigating micro-ecological processes in soil. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据