4.6 Article

Swimming with a cage: low-Reynolds-number locomotion inside a droplet

期刊

SOFT MATTER
卷 13, 期 17, 页码 3161-3173

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6sm01636g

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Supercomputing Centre (CSCS) [s603]
  2. Swedish Research Council [2015-06334]
  3. ERC [SimCoMiCs 280117]
  4. Marie Curie CIG Grant
  5. ERC
  6. Max Planck Society
  7. Swedish Research Council [2015-06334] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inspired by recent experiments using synthetic microswimmers to manipulate droplets, we investigate the low-Reynolds-number locomotion of a model swimmer (a spherical squirmer) encapsulated inside a droplet of a comparable size in another viscous fluid. Meditated solely by hydrodynamic interactions, the encaged swimmer is seen to be able to propel the droplet, and in some situations both remain in a stable co-swimming state. The problem is tackled using both an exact analytical theory and a numerical implementation based on a boundary element method, with a particular focus on the kinematics of the co-moving swimmer and the droplet in a concentric configuration, and we obtain excellent quantitative agreement between the two. The droplet always moves slower than a swimmer which uses purely tangential surface actuation but when it uses a particular combination of tangential and normal actuations, the squirmer and droplet are able to attain the same velocity and stay concentric for all times. We next employ numerical simulations to examine the stability of their concentric co-movement, and highlight several stability scenarios depending on the particular gait adopted by the swimmer. Furthermore, we show that the droplet reverses the nature of the far-field flow induced by the swimmer: a droplet cage turns a pusher swimmer into a puller, and vice versa. Our work sheds light on the potential development of droplets as self-contained carriers of both chemical content and self-propelled devices for controllable and precise drug deliveries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据