4.6 Article

Interplay between bulk self-assembly, interfacial and foaming properties in a catanionic surfactant mixture of varying composition

期刊

SOFT MATTER
卷 13, 期 39, 页码 7197-7206

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7sm01601h

关键词

-

资金

  1. French CNRS [FR3507]
  2. CEAMETSA network
  3. Investissements d'Avenir'' of the LabEx PALM [ANR-10-LABX-0039-PALM]
  4. Science and Technology Foundation (FCT), Portugal
  5. FEDER/COMPETE [UID/QUI/00081/2013, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006980, NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000028]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The self-aggregation, surface properties and foamability of the catanionic surfactant mixture cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)/sodium octyl sulfonate (SOSo) have been investigated to obtain insight on the relation between bulk nanostructures, surfactant packing, and foam stability and aging. Light microscopy, SANS, cryo-TEM, DLS, surface tension, rheometry and direct photography were used to characterize mixtures with varying CTAB molar fraction, xCTAB. In the bulk, self-assembly is richer in the excess CTAB region than in the excess SOSo one. Starting from neat CTAB micelles and on addition of anionic surfactant, there is a change from small ellipsoidal micelles (1 < x(CTAB) <= 0.80) to large rodlike micelles (0.65 <= x(CTAB) < 0.55) and then to vesicles (0 < x(CTAB) <= 0.50), with coexistence regions in between; SOSo-rich mixtures are thus dominated by vesicles. High size polydispersity for the micelles and vesicles is an intrinsic feature of this system. Foam stability is concomitantly impacted by xCTAB. SOSo is a small mobile molecule and so it disrupts foam stability, irrespective of the presence of vesicles. Foams are thus only stable in the CTAB-rich regions, and SANS shows that the shape of micelles and vesicles is unchanged inside the foam. Foam drainage is thereby mostly controlled by the presence of the elongated micelles through the solution viscosity, whereas coarsening is influenced by dense surfactant packing at the gas-liquid interfaces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据