4.6 Article

Revisiting the generalized scaling law for adhesion: role of compliance and extension to progressive failure

期刊

SOFT MATTER
卷 13, 期 41, 页码 7529-7536

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7sm01098b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Provost's Office
  2. NSF CAREER [CMMI-1454153]
  3. Provost's College of Engineering
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1454153] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A generalized scaling law, based on the classical fracture mechanics approach, is developed to predict the bond strength of adhesive systems. The proposed scaling relationship depends on the rate of change of debond area with compliance, rather than the ratio of area to compliance. This distinction can have a profound impact on the expected bond strength of systems, particularly when the failure mechanism changes or the compliance of the load train increases. Based on the classical fracture mechanics approach for rate-independent materials, the load train compliance should not affect the force capacity of the adhesive system, whereas when the area to compliance ratio is used as the scaling parameter, it directly influences the bond strength, making it necessary to distinguish compliance contributions. To verify the scaling relationship, single lap shear tests were performed for a given pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA) tape specimens with different bond areas, number of backing layers, and load train compliance. The shear lag model was used to derive closed-form relationships for the system compliance and its derivative with respect to the debond area. Digital image correlation (DIC) is implemented to verify the non-uniform shear stress distribution obtained from the shear lag model in a lap shear geometry. The results obtained from this approach could lead to a better understanding of the relationship between bond strength and the geometry and mechanical properties of adhesive systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据