4.5 Article

THE IMPACTS OF ORGANIC MATTER ON THE DISTRIBUTION AND METHYLATION OF MERCURY IN A HYDROELECTRIC RESERVOIR IN WUJIANG RIVER, SOUTHWEST CHINA

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 191-199

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/etc.3181

关键词

Cage aquaculture activities; Organic matter; Mercury; Methylation; Hydroelectric reservoir

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China (973 program) [2013CB430004]
  2. Chinese Natural Science Foundation [41373056, 41273099, 40873085]
  3. Key Project Technology of Agriculture, Science and Technology Office of Guizhou Province [20133029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To understand the impacts of organic matter on the geochemical processing of Hg in a hydroelectric reservoir, spatial and seasonal distributions of total mercury (THg) and methylmercury (MeHg) in both solid and liquid phases of sediment cores were investigated in the Wujiangdu Reservoir in Guizhou Province, China. Four sampling sites with different intensities of cage aquaculture activities were chosen and were evenly distributed from upstream to downstream of the Wujiangdu Reservoir. Elevated MeHg concentrations and the high percentage of MeHg in solid and liquid phases of the surface sediment demonstrated that the active Hg methylation process occurred downstream of the Wujiangdu Reservoir. In contrast, the absence of obvious peaks for MeHg in sediment from the upper reaches of the Wujiangdu Reservoir, consistent with low levels of organic matter, suggested that production of MeHg was limited. In sediment with high organic matter content, reduction occurred closer to the sediment surface, resulting in maximum MeHg concentration in these layers. The correlation between MeHg and organic carbon implied that organic matter content in the sediment originating from cage aquaculture activities can help to predict MeHg production rates in reservoirs, which could be used to assess possible MeHg contamination in a reservoir ecosystem. (C) 2015 SETAC

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据