4.8 Article

Memantine-Loaded PEGylated Biodegradable Nanoparticles for the Treatment of Glaucoma

期刊

SMALL
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201701808

关键词

drug delivery; glaucoma; memantine; nanoparticles; PLGA-PEG

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [MAT 2014-59134-R, SAF-2016-33307]
  2. Spanish Ministry [BES-2012-056083]
  3. European Funds (PRODER/COMPETE) [UID/AGR/04033/2013, M-ERA-NET-0004/2015-PAIRED, UID/QUI/50006/2013]
  4. FEDER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glaucoma is a multifactorial neurodegenerative disease associated with retinal ganglion cells (RGC) loss. Increasing reports of similarities in glaucoma and other neurodegenerative conditions have led to speculation that therapies for brain neurodegenerative disorders may also have potential as glaucoma therapies. Memantine is an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist approved for Alzheimer's disease treatment. Glutamate-induced excitotoxicity is implicated in glaucoma and NMDA receptor antagonism is advocated as a potential strategy for RGC preservation. This study describes the development of a topical formulation of memantine-loaded PLGA-PEG nanoparticles (MEM-NP) and investigates the efficacy of this formulation using a well-established glaucoma model. MEM-NPs <200 nm in diameter and incorporating 4 mg mL(-1) of memantine were prepared with 0.35 mg mL(-1) localized to the aqueous interior. In vitro assessment indicated sustained release from MEM-NPs and ex vivo ocular permeation studies demonstrated enhanced delivery. MEM-NPs were additionally found to be well tolerated in vitro (human retinoblastoma cells) and in vivo (Draize test). Finally, when applied topically in a rodent model of ocular hypertension for three weeks, MEM-NP eye drops were found to significantly (p < 0.0001) reduce RGC loss. These results suggest that topical MEM-NP is safe, well tolerated, and, most promisingly, neuroprotective in an experimental glaucoma model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据