4.8 Article

Enabling Flexible Heterostructures for Li-Ion Battery Anodes Based on Nanotube and Liquid-Phase Exfoliated 2D Gallium Chalcogenide Nanosheet Colloidal Solutions

期刊

SMALL
卷 13, 期 34, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201701677

关键词

chalcogenides; in situ XRD; Li-ion battery; liquid-phase exfoliation; percolated networks

资金

  1. SFI AMBER
  2. SFI PIYRA
  3. ERC StG 2DNanoCaps
  4. ERC PoC 2DUSD
  5. ERC PoC 2DInk
  6. FP7 MC ITN MoWSeS
  7. Horizon2020 NMP Co-Pilot
  8. ERC SEMANTICS
  9. SFI [11/PI/1087, 15/SIRG/3329, PI_10/IN.1/I3030]
  10. China Scholarship Council [201304490006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

2D metal chalcogenide (MC) nanosheets (NS) have displayed high capacities as lithium-ion battery (LiB) anodes. Nevertheless, their complicated synthesis routes coupled with low electronic conductivity greatly limit them as promising LiB electrode material. Here, this work reports a facile single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) percolating strategy for efficiently maximizing the electrochemical performances of gallium chalcogenide (GaX, X = S or Se). Multiscaled flexible GaX NS/SWCNT heterostructures with abundant voids for Li+ diffusion are fabricated by embedding the liquid-exfoliated GaX NS matrix within a SWCNT-percolated network; the latter improves the electron transport and ion diffusion kinetics as well as maintains the mechanical flexibility. Consequently, high capacities (i.e., 838 mAh g(-1) per gallium (II) sulfide (GaS) NS/SWCNT mass and 1107 mAh g(-1) per GaS mass; the latter is close to the theoretical value) and good rate capabilities are achieved, which can be majorly attributed to the alloying processes of disordered Ga formed after the first irreversible GaX conversion reaction, as monitored by in situ X-ray diffraction. The presented approach, colloidal solution processing of SWCNT and liquid-exfoliated MC NS to produce flexible paper-based electrode, could be generalized for wearable energy storage devices with promising performances.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据