4.8 Article

Fluorescent Polymer Nanoparticles for Cell Barcoding In Vitro and In Vivo

期刊

SMALL
卷 13, 期 38, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201701582

关键词

dye-loaded polymer nanoparticles; fluorescence microscopy; long-term cell tacking; optical coding; zebrafish

资金

  1. European Research Council ERC [648528]
  2. LabEx Chimie des Systemes Complexes
  3. La Ligue Contre le Cancer
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [648528] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fluorescent polymer nanoparticles for long-term labeling and tracking of living cells with any desired color code are developed. They are built from biodegradable poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) polymer loaded with cyanine dyes (DiO, DiI, and DiD) with the help of bulky fluorinated counterions, which minimize aggregation-caused quenching. At the single particle level, these particles are approximate to 20-fold brighter than quantum dots of similar color. Due to their identical 40 nm size and surface properties, these nanoparticles are endocytosed equally well by living cells. Mixing nanoparticles of three colors in different proportions generates a homogeneous RGB (red, green, and blue) barcode in cells, which is transmitted through many cell generations. Cell barcoding is validated on 7 cell lines (HeLa, KB, embryonic kidney (293T), Chinese hamster ovary, rat basophilic leucemia, U97, and D2A1), 13 color codes, and it enables simultaneous tracking of co-cultured barcoded cell populations for > 2 weeks. It is also applied to studying competition among drug-treated cell populations. This technology enabled six-color imaging in vivo for (1) tracking xenografted cancer cells and (2) monitoring morphogenesis after microinjection in zebrafish embryos. In addition to a robust method of multicolor cell labeling and tracking, this work suggests that multiple functions can be co-localized inside cells by combining structurally close nanoparticles carrying different functions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据