4.8 Article

Well-Defined Cobalt Catalyst with N-Doped Carbon Layers Enwrapping: The Correlation between Surface Atomic Structure and Electrocatalytic Property

期刊

SMALL
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201702074

关键词

coating layers; electrocatalysts; oxygen reduction reaction; surface engineering; X-ray absorption spectroscopy

资金

  1. MOST [2017YFA0303500, 2014CB848900]
  2. NSFC [U1532112, 11375198, 11574280, 11605201]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [BH2310000033]
  4. CAS Iterdisciplinary Innovation Team
  5. Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy Materials Chemistry (Ministry of Education) Nankai University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Admittedly, the surface atomic structure of heterogenous catalysts toward the electrochemical oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) are accepted as the important features that can tune catalytic activity and even catalytic pathway. Herein, a surface engineering strategy to controllably synthesize a carbon-layer-wrapped cobalt-catalyst from 2D cobalt-based metal-organic frameworks is elaborately demonstrated. Combined with synchrotron radiation X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, the soft X-ray absorption near-edge structure results confirmed that rich covalent interfacial Co-N-C bonds are efficiently formed between cobalt nanoparticles and wrapped carbon-layers during the polydopamine-assisted pyrolysis process. The X-ray absorption fine structure and corresponding extended X-ray absorption fine structure spectra further reveal that the wrapped cobalt with Co-N coordinations shows distinct surface distortion and atomic environmental change of Co-based active sites. In contrast to the control sample without coating layers, the 800 degrees C-annealed cobalt catalyst with N-doped carbon layers enwrapping achieves significantly enhanced ORR activity with onset and half-wave potentials of 0.923 and 0.816 V (vs reversible hydrogen electrode), highlighting the important correlation between surface atomic structure and catalytic property.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据