4.8 Article

Solution-Grown CsPbBr3/Cs4PbBr6 Perovskite Nanocomposites: Toward Temperature-Insensitive Optical Gain

期刊

SMALL
卷 13, 期 34, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201701587

关键词

halide perovskites; lasing; nanocomposites; optical gain; temperature-insensitivity

资金

  1. Singapore Ministry of Education through the Academic Research Fund [MOE2016-T2-1-054, Tier 1-RG105/16, Tier 1-RG92/15]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2014CB931700]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With regards to developing miniaturized coherent light sources, the temperature-insensitivity in gain spectrum and threshold is highly desirable. Quantum dots (QDs) are predicted to possess a temperature-insensitive threshold by virtue of the separated electronic states; however, it is never observed in colloidal QDs due to the poor thermal stability. Besides, for the classical II-VI QDs, the gain profile generally redshifts with increasing temperature, plaguing the device chromaticity. Herein, this paper addresses the above two issues simultaneously by embedding ligands-free CsPbBr3 nanocrystals in a wider band gap Cs4PbBr6 matrix by solution-phase synthesis. The unique electronic structures of CsPbBr3 nanocrystals enable temperature-insensitive gain spectrum while the lack of ligands and protection from Cs4PbBr6 matrix ensure the thermal stability and high temperature operation. Specifically, a color drift-free stimulated emission irrespective of temperature change (20-150 degrees C) upon two-photon pumping is presented and the characteristic temperature is determined to be as high as approximate to 260 K. The superior gain properties of the CsPbBr3/Cs4PbBr6 perovskite nanocomposites are directly validated by a vertical cavity surface emitting laser operating at temperature as high as 100 degrees C. The results shed light on manipulating optical gain from the advantageous CsPbBr3 nanocrystals and represent a significant step toward the temperature-insensitive frequency-upconverted lasers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据