4.8 Article

A Freestanding and Long-Life Sodium-Selenium Cathode by Encapsulation of Selenium into Microporous Multichannel Carbon Nanofibers

期刊

SMALL
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201703252

关键词

electrospinning; multichannel carbon nanofibers; Na-Se batteries; Se

资金

  1. National Key R&D program of China [2016YFB0100305]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21373195, 51674228, 51622210]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK3430000004, WK2320000034]
  4. Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology
  5. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [2013286]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selenium cathode has attracted more and more attention because of its comparable volumetric capacity but much higher electrical conductivity than sulfur cathode. Compared to Li-Se batteries, Na-Se batteries show many advantages, including the low cost of sodium resources and high volumetric capacity. However, Na-Se batteries still suffer from the shuttle effect of polyselenides and high volumetric expansion, resulting in the poor electrochemical performance. Herein, Se is impregnated into microporous multichannel carbon nanofibers (Se@MCNFs) thin film with high flexibility as a binder-free cathode material for Na-Se batteries. The fibrous unique structure of the Se@MCNFs is beneficial to alleviate the volume change of Se during cycling, improve the utilization of active material, and suppress the dissolution of polyselenides into electrolyte. The freestanding Se@MCNF thin-film electrode exhibits high discharge capacity (596 mA h g(-1) at the 100th cycle at 0.1 A g(-1)) and excellent rate capability (379 mA h g(-1) at 2 A g(-1)) for Na-Se batteries. In addition, it also shows long cycle life with a negligible capacity decay of 0.067% per cycle over 300 cycles at 0.5 A g(-1). This work demonstrates the possibility to develop high performance Na-Se batteries and flexible energy storage devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据