期刊
SLEEP MEDICINE
卷 34, 期 -, 页码 109-117出版社
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2017.01.024
关键词
Obstructive sleep apnea; Positional obstructive sleep apnea; Positional therapy; Oral appliances; Randomized, controlled trial
资金
- Dutch grant from 'fonds NutsOhra,' the Netherlands [1104-031]
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of positional therapy (PT) with the sleep position trainer (SPT) to oral appliance therapy (OAT) in patients with mild-to-moderate positional obstructive sleep apnea (POSA). Methods: Multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Patients with mild-to-moderate POSA (apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) >= 5 <= 30/hour sleep) were randomized for PT or OAT. Polysomnography was repeated after 3 months. Efficacy, adherence, mean disease alleviation (MDA), quality of life, dropouts and adverse events were evaluated. Results: A total of 177 patients were screened for the study; 99 underwent randomization and 81 completed the study. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis of median [IQR] AHI showed a reduction in the PT group from 13.0 [9.7-18.5] to 7.0 [3.8-12.8], p < 0.001 and in the OAT group from 11.7 [9.0-16.2] to 9.1 [4.9-11.7], p < 0.001. Mean adherence (>= 4 h/night, >= 5 days/week) was 89.3 +/- 22.4% for SPT versus 81.3 +/- 30.0% in OAT patients, p = 0.208. Conclusions: Oral appliance therapy and positional therapy were equally effective in reducing the median AHI in patients with mild-to-moderate POSA. The results of this study have important implications for future OSA treatment guidelines and daily clinical practice. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据