4.3 Article

Durability of treatment effects of the Sleep Position Trainer versus oral appliance therapy in positional OSA: 12-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial

期刊

SLEEP AND BREATHING
卷 22, 期 2, 页码 441-450

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11325-017-1568-4

关键词

Obstructive sleep apnea; Sleep position; Positional therapy; Oral appliance therapy; Randomized controlled trial

资金

  1. Fonds NutsOhra [Project 1104-031] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose The Sleep Position Trainer (SPT) is a new option for treating patients with positional obstructive sleep apnea (POSA). This study investigated long-term efficacy, adherence, and quality of life during use of the SPT device compared with oral appliance therapy (OAT) in patients with POSA. Methods This prospective, multicenter trial randomized patients with mild to moderate POSA (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] 5-30/h) to SPT or OAT. Polysomnography was performed at baseline and after 3 and 12 months' follow-up. The primary endpoint was OSA severity; adherence, quality of life, and adverse events were also assessed. Results Ninety-nine patients were randomized and 58 completed the study (29 in each group). Median AHI in the SPT group decreased from 13.2/h at baseline to 7.1/h after 12 months (P < 0.001); corresponding values in the OAT group were 13.4/h and 5.0/h (P < 0.001), with no significant between-group difference (P = 1.000). Improvements throughout the study were maintained at 12 months. Longterm median adherence was also similar in the two treatment groups; the proportion of patients who used their device for >= 4 h for 5 days in a week was 100% in the SPT group and 97.0% in the OAT group (P = 0.598). Conclusions The efficacy of SPT therapy was maintained over 12 months and was comparable to that of OAT in patients with mild to moderate POSA. Adherence was relatively high, and similar in the two groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据