4.3 Article

Nocturnal blood pressure fluctuations measured by using pulse transit time in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

期刊

SLEEP AND BREATHING
卷 22, 期 2, 页码 337-343

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11325-017-1555-9

关键词

Obstructive sleep apnea; Blood pressure; Nocturnal blood pressure fluctuations; Pulse transit time; Hypertension

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is related to arterial hypertension. In the present study, we test the hypothesis that patients with severe OSAS have excessive apnea induced blood pressure (BP). Methods We investigated 97 patients with an apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) greater than 30. Systolic BP (SBP) was continuously determined by using the pulse transit time (PTT). Apnea/hypopnea induced nocturnal BP fluctuations (NBPFs) were detected and showed phenomena of continuous increases of the SBP baseline. Such periods of SBP baseline elevations >= 10 mmHg were called superposition. Respiratory and cardiac parameters were obtained from the polysomnographic investigation. Results Eighty-four periods of superposition were detected in 48 patients. They occurred mainly during REM sleep (76%). Apnea duration was increased and the time in respiration was reduced in periods of superposition compared to nonsuperposition periods. In superposition periods mean oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) and the minimal SpO(2) were lower, desaturations were more pronounced, and the mean heart rate (HR) was increased. The maximum SBP during superposition was significantly increased (204 +/- 32 vs. 171 +/- 28 mmHg). The clinic BP was higher in patients with superposition (SBP 149.2 +/- 17.5 vs. 140 +/- 19.1, DBP 91.5 +/- 11.5 vs. 86.3 +/- 11.8). Conclusions The study reveals that patients with severe OSAS can have periods of BP superposition during night with extremely high SBP and very low oxygen saturation, which may add to a high risk for cardiovascular events during the night.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据