4.7 Article

Evaluation of different demulsifiers for Marpol oil waste recovery

期刊

JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 40-49

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2017.02.013

关键词

Marpol oil waste; Water-in-Marpol oil emulsion; Demulsifier; Oil water separation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Marpol oil waste composed of wasted oil with seawater which is challenging for waste treatment. Therefore, emulsified seawater has to be broken down for recovering the oil content involving chemical destabilizer to disperse water droplets or destroy emulsifiers. This study aims to evaluate 37 products of demulsifiers (cationic, non-ionic and anionic) based on ability of water removal from Marpol oil waste. The results show that anionic and nonionic surfactants were found to be effective demulsifiers exhibiting good property for oil and water separation. The efficiency of the nonionic demulsifiers increases with the dosage up to a certain extent after which the efficiency falls. However, anionic demulsifiers do not show any decrease in efficiency at higher doses. Among all the tested anionic demulsifiers, sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate (ALCOPOL O70 PG), sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate (ALCOPOL O CONC 60%) and Oligoguluronate (DP9-6661) were with most outstanding performance. Additionally there is a general improvement in the performance of screened demulsifiers with increased temperature (70 degrees C). Sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate (ALCOPOL O70 PG), sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate (ALCOPOL O CONC 60%) and sodium dodecyl benzene sulphonate (DP9-6661) reached water removal performance percentage as 75%, 66.3% and 56.7% respectively after 30 h. When the water content of recovered oil was reduced to a certain level (below 10%), the heat valve was about 40 MJ/kg. The recovered Marpol oil waste was suggested to apply for low-quality fuel usage such as cement kilns and waste incinerators with its property of high energy value, low sulphur content and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs). (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据