4.2 Article

Emerging role of novel therapies in Hodgkin lymphoma: proceed with caution

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/asheducation-2017.1.317

关键词

-

资金

  1. Pfizer
  2. KITE
  3. Merck Co
  4. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  5. Immune Design
  6. Forty Seven
  7. Affimed
  8. Janssen
  9. Pharmacyclics
  10. Millennium
  11. Astra Zeneca
  12. ImaginAB
  13. Novartis
  14. Genentech
  15. Seattle Genetics
  16. Celgene

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on very high response rates in the relapsed and refractory setting, brentuximab vedotin and the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors, nivolumab and pembrolizumab, have quickly been incorporated into clinical trials for first- and second-line therapy of Hodgkin lymphoma. Preliminary data show that brentuximab vedotin alone is not adequate therapy for newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma in older patients, but modestly decreases the risk of relapse when combined with adnamycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine in patients with previously untreated advanced-stage. disease. In second-line therapy, combining brentuximab vedotin with conventional chemotherapy or with PD-1 inhibitors' as pretransplant salvage is associated with high overall and complete response rates, although further follow up is needed to assess whether posttransplant outcomes are improved. Although these new drugs are well tolerated when given as single agents, unexpected toxicities have been encountered with combination regimens, specifically severe pulmonary toxicity with the bleomycin and brentuximab vedotin combination and frequent infusion-related reactions. There is concern with the use of PD-1 inhibitors as first-line therapy due to the theoretical potential for more frequent or severe immune-mediated toxicities in patients who have not received prior chemotherapy. Aside from these concerns, these new agents have the potential to improve outcomes for patients even further, bringing us closer to eradicating recurrent Hodgkin lymphoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据