4.6 Article

Infimal Convolution of Data Discrepancies for Mixed Noise Removal

期刊

SIAM JOURNAL ON IMAGING SCIENCES
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 1196-1233

出版社

SIAM PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.1137/16M1101684

关键词

total variation regularization; image denoising; mixed noise distribution; Huber regularization; semismooth Newton optimization

资金

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) of the University of Cambridge Centre for Doctoral Training [EP/H023348/1]
  2. Cambridge Centre for Analysis (CCA)
  3. joint ANR/FWF Project Efficient Algorithms for Nonsmooth Optimization in Imaging (EANOI) [FWF I1148 / ANR-12-IS01-0003]
  4. Leverhulme Trust project on Breaking the non-convexity barrier, EPSRC grant [EP/M00483X/1]
  5. EPSRC Centre [EP/N014588/1]
  6. Cantab Capital Institute for the Mathematics of Information
  7. Alan Turing Institute
  8. Escuela Politecnica Nacional de Ecuador [PIJ-15-22]
  9. EPSRC [EP/M00483X/1, EP/N014588/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We consider the problem of image denoising in the presence of noise whose statistical properties are a combination of two different distributions. We focus on noise distributions frequently considered in applications, such as salt & pepper and Gaussian, and Gaussian and Poisson noise mixtures. We derive a variational image denoising model that features a total variation regularization term and a data discrepancy encoding the mixed noise as an infimal convolution of discrepancy terms of the single-noise distributions. We give a statistical derivation of this model by joint maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation. Classical single-noise models are recovered asymptotically as the weighting parameters go to infinity. The numerical solution of the model is computed using second order Newton-type methods. Numerical results show the decomposition of the noise into its constituting components. The paper is furnished with several numerical experiments, and comparisons with other methods dealing with the mixed noise case are shown.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据