4.7 Article

An evaluation of hydroxamate collectors for malachite flotation

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 183, 期 -, 页码 258-269

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.02.056

关键词

Hydroxamates; Malachite; Flotation; Surface chemistry; Zeta potential

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Avalon Rare Metals [RGPIN-2014-06230]
  3. NSERC Canada
  4. McGill Engineering Doctoral Award
  5. NSERC Alexander Graham Bell Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Copper oxide minerals, such as malachite, do not often respond well to traditional copper sulphide collectors, and require alternative flotation schemes. Hydroxamic acid collectors have been suggested as a means to directly float malachite; however, there is limited information on the effect of reagent structure on the performance of these collectors. This paper investigated the effect of five alkyl hydroxamates and two aromatic hydroxamates on the flotation of a synthetic ore composed of pure, fully liberated, malachite and quartz. Zeta potential measurements were used to aid in understanding reagent adsorption onto the surface of the two minerals. The collectors were then evaluated using bench scale flotation results. While zeta potential measurements suggested that all the collectors investigated selectively adsorb onto the surface of malachite, only benzohydroxamic acid and C-8 alkyl hydroxamates were effective collectors in the flotation of malachite. Benzohydroxamic acid was the most selective; however, significantly lower dosages of C-8 alkyl hydroxamates were required to obtain similar malachite recoveries, with minimal increases in quartz recovery. Benzo- and octylhydroxamic acid were further examined for the flotation of fine (-38 mu m) particles. For fine particle flotation experiments the effect of temperature was also investigated as a means to improve the flotation performance. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据