4.7 Article

Ionic liquid-based synergistic extraction of rare earths nitrates without diluent: Typical ion-association mechanism

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 179, 期 -, 页码 349-356

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.02.026

关键词

Cyphos (R) IL 101; DEHEHP; Synergistic extraction; Rare earths; Undiluted

资金

  1. 973 Project [2012CBA01202]
  2. Key Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [KGZD-EW-201-1]
  3. Scientific Research Found of Liaoning Provincial Education Department [L2014004]
  4. Program for Liaoning Excellent Talents in University [LR2015026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The coexistence of tricaprylmethylammonium nitrate ([A336][NO3]) and Di(2-ethylhexyl) 2-ethylhexyl phosphonate (DEHEHP) has been found an obvious synergistic extraction effect for rare earths nitrates. In this work, synergistic extraction behaviors without any diluent for rare earth nitrates based on tri(hexyl)tetradecylphosphonium chloride (Cyphos (R) IL 101, [P66614][Cl]) and DEHEHP have been further investigated. Pr(III) was still used as a model RE, and the maximum synergistic extraction distribution ratio was obtained at a volume ratio of 2:3 for [P66614][Cl] and DEHEHP. The synergistic enhancement coefficients have been tested for the whole rare earths. Results show that there is an obvious synergistic enhancement effect for light REs (La-Sm) and an anti-synergistic effect for Gd-Lu including Y. The effects of acidity, anions and metal ion concentrations on the extraction have been investigated. The extraction mechanism has been confirmed to be the typical ion-association reactions. The maximum loading capacity is 0.78 mol/L Pr at 293.15 K. The extraction ability of [P66614][Cl]-DEHEHP is superior to that of reported [A336][NO3]-DEHEHP, and is also greater than that of common acidic organophosphate-kerosene extraction system. Stripping, recyclability, and selectivity between REs and non-REs, has also been investigated. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据