4.7 Article

Permeation and separation of SO2, H2S and CO2 through thermally rearranged (TR) polymeric membranes

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 179, 期 -, 页码 449-454

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2016.12.039

关键词

Thermal rearrangement; Membranes; Hydrogen sulfide; Sulfur dioxide; Permeability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The permeabilities of sulfur dioxide and hydrogen sulfide are reported here for two copolymer based TR membranes, as a function of feed partial pressure and temperature. The two TR membranes are formed from the precursor co-polyimide 4,4'-(hexafluoroisopropylidene) diphthalic anhydride (6FDA), 3,3'-dihy droxyl-4,4'-diaminobiphenyl (HAB) and 2,4,6-trimethyl-m-phylenediamine (DAM) (6FDA-HAB-DAM), where one of the membranes undergoes crosslinking with 3,5-diaminobenzoic acid (DABA) during TR. It was observed that SO2 permeability decreased with increasing partial pressure and temperature in both TR membranes. This is indicative that SO2 permeability is dominated by SO2 solubility within the TR membranes, and is attributed to the high condensability of SO2. Both polymeric membranes displayed selectivity for SO2 against CO2, with separation performance similar to other classes of polymeric membranes. H2S permeability was observed to decrease with increasing partial pressure and temperature for the cross-linked TR (XTR) membrane. The non-cross-linked TR membrane displayed constant H2S permeability with pressure and permeability increased with increasing temperature. Hence, permeability within the XTR membrane was H2S solubility dominated, while in the non-crosslinked TR membrane permeability was H2S diffusivity dominated. This was attributed to the difference in free volume and cavity size distribution in the TR membrane as a result of crosslinking. It was observed that both membranes displayed H2S/CO2 selectivity of less than one, indicative that they favor CO2 over H2S. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据