4.7 Article

Potential application of graphene oxide membranes for removal of Cs(I) and Sr(II) from high level-liquid waste

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 188, 期 -, 页码 523-529

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.07.062

关键词

Graphene oxide membrane; High level-liquid waste; Permeation; Cs(I); Sr(II)

资金

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA02030000]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [11305244]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a new carbon-based membrane material used for ionic and molecular sieving, the graphene oxide (GO) membrane also has potential application in radiochemical separation. In this work, the permeation performances of some typical metallic elements in high level-liquid waste (HLLW) through the ionic sieving 5-mu m-thick GO membranes were investigated. It was found that the permeation rates of ions through GO membranes markedly decreased with the increase of hydrated ionic radii. Cs(I) and Sr(II) permeated through GO membranes quickly, whereas lanthanide ions and actinide ions infiltrated much more slowly, thus providing the feasibility of separation according to the difference of hydrated ionic radii. Moreover, the concentrations of initial metal ions and acidity in feed solutions also had influences on the permeation of ions through GO membranes, and higher initial metal ions and feed solution acidity were favorable to the removal of Cs(I) and Sr(II). The barrier separation test indicated that GO membranes had promising ability for the separation of Cs(I) and Sr(II) from lanthanide and actinide ions due to the difference of hydrated ion radius, and the separation factor of Cs(I)/U(VI) and Sr(II)/U(VI) would reach about 10 and 3 in single penetration. The presented results demonstrated that the membrane separation based on GO membrane would be a promising candidate for the removal of Cs(I) and Sr(II) from HLLW.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据