4.7 Article

Enhanced formaldehyde sensing properties of hollow SnO2 nanofibers by graphene oxide

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 250, 期 -, 页码 533-542

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2017.04.164

关键词

Hollow SnO2 nanofibers; Graphene oxide; Nanocomposites; Formaldehyde detection

资金

  1. NNSF of China [51402193, 51572173, 51602197, 11402149]
  2. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission [16060502300, 16JC1402200, 15520720300, 14JC1400702]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing [SKLHOP201503]
  4. Zhejiang Provincial key Lab for Chem & Bio Processing Technology of Farm Product [2016KF0008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hollow SnO2 nanofibers were prepared by electrospinning followed by calcination treatment. The carbon materials including graphene, carbon nanotubes and graphene oxide (GO) were utilized as sensitization materials to enhance the formaldehyde (HCHO) sensing properties. The results showed that the HCHO sensing properties of hollow SnO2 nanofibers were greatly improved by mixing with a small amount of GO. X-ray diffraction (XRD), Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) were used to characterize their microstructures, morphologies, compositions and surface areas. The effect of GO loading amount in the nanocomposites on the sensing performances was also investigated. 1 wt% GO was the optimized loading amount and the response value reached 32 under the exposure of 100 ppm HCHO at the optimum temperature of 120 degrees C, which was 4 times higher than that of hollow SnO2 nanofibers. The detection limit of HCHO was as low as 500 ppb. The unique sensing properties were attributed to the synergistic effects of hollow SnO2 nanofibers and GO nanosheets network, including large specific surface area, rich functional groups and the electric regulation effects of GO. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据