4.7 Article

ZnO-nanowire size effect induced ultra-high sensing response to ppb-level H2S

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 240, 期 -, 页码 264-272

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.08.120

关键词

Nano-size sensing effect; ZnO nanowires; High sensitivity; H2S sensor; ppb-level gas detection

资金

  1. MOST of China [2016YFA0200800]
  2. NSF of China [61401446, 6152781861604163, 91323304, 61321492]
  3. NSF of Shanghai [15ZR1447300]
  4. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai [14521106100]
  5. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [2016213]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Presented is nano-size effect of ZnO nanowires (NWs) on sensitivity of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) detection in ambient atmosphere. The sensing mechanism of ZnO NWs for H2S detection is found coming from nano-size effect that governs both the sulfuration reaction when H2S is introduced and the following desulfuration reaction when the gas is removed from air. Based on the nano-material property of smaller dimension featuring higher chemical-activity at surface, the sensitivity of ZnO NWs to ultra-low concentration H2S is expected to be increased by shrinking the NW diameter. In our experiment, suspended micro hotplates for chemiresistive sensing are fabricated to investigate the nano-size sensing effect. Besides conventional ZnO NWs with the diameter as 50 nm, a novel tree-branched nano-structure of ZnO NWs (with the branch diameter as 20 nm) is in situ grown onto the sensing-area of the micro hotplate. In order to investigate the sensing effect, both the 20 nm NW sensor and the 50 nm NW sensor are used to experimentally detect H2S with concentrations in the range of ppb-ppm. The 20 nm ZnO-NWs sensor realizes resoluble sensing to 5 ppb H2S, while the 50nm sensor can only response to H2S with concentration higher than 50 ppb. The well validated nano-size effect of thinner NWs featuring higher sensing response can be extended for various chemical sensing nano-materials. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据