4.7 Article

Development of highly selective and sensitive fluorimetric label-free mercury aptasensor based on cysteamine@CdTe/ZnS quantum dots, experimental and theoretical investigation

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 247, 期 -, 页码 400-407

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2017.03.082

关键词

Mercury ions; CdTe/ZnS core/shell quantum dots; Folding of the aptasensor; Fluorescence method

资金

  1. Isfahan University of Technology (IUT) Research Council, Center of Excellence in Sensorand Green Chemistry
  2. institute of biotechnology and bioengineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, an ultra-sensitive and highly selective label-free fluorescent aptasensor was developedfor the rapid detection of Hg(II), using water soluble cysteamine-capped CdTe/ZnS quantum dots (cysteamine@CdTe/ZnS QDs) as an luminescent probe and a single strain DNA aptamer designed to specifically bind to Hg(II) ions. Negative charge aptamers could aggregate the cationic cysteamine@CdTe/ZnS core/shell quantum dots, so the fluorescence quenching occurred. When Hg(II) ions, as a target, were added to the quantum dots solution, the aptamers with thymine (T)-rich sequences were selectively bound to the mercury ions. This is due to the powerful affinity of Hg(II) ions to the T bases of the DNA aptamer. It leads to the formation of an Hg (II)-bridged T base pair and the aptamers rearrangement into a hairpin-like structure. In the presence of Hg(II), de-aggregation of the quantum dots was occurs, so the fluorescence intensity was gradually increased with enhancing its concentration. Hg(II) could be measured in the range of 5.0 x 10(-10) to 1.0 x 10(-6) mol L-1 with a low limit of detection, 8.0 x 10(-11) mol L-1. The fabricated fluorescent aptasensor also demonstrated excellent selectivity for Hg(II) detection, this principal was investigated by theoretical and experimental methods so it was applied lucratively for the determination of Hg(II) in real water and waste water samples. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据