4.7 Article

Pilot-scale study on nitrogen and aromatic compounds removal in printing and dyeing wastewater by reinforced hydrolysis-denitrification coupling process and its microbial community analysis

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 22, 期 12, 页码 9483-9493

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4124-4

关键词

Printing and dyeingwastewater; Nitrogen; Aromatics; UASB; Hydrolysis-denitrification coupling process; Microbial community

资金

  1. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment [2012ZX07101-003]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jangsu Province of China [BK20140852]
  3. Operation for Central University of Hohai University [2013/B13020024]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aiming to efficiently dispose printing and dyeing wastewater with high organic nitrogen and aromatic compounds, but low carbon source quality, the reinforced anaerobic hydrolysis-denitrification coupling process, based on improved UASB reactors and segregated collection-disposition strategy, was designed and applied at the pilot scale. Results showed that the coupling process displayed efficient removal for these two kinds of pollutants (nitrogen and aromatics), since the concentration of NH3-N (shortened as rho (NH3-N)) < 8 mg/L, rho (TN) < 15 mg/L with long-term stability for the effluent, and both species and abundances of aromatics reduced greatly by UASBs according to GC-MS. Microbial community analysis by PCR-DGGE showed that Bacteroidetes and Alphaproteobacteria were the dominant communities in the bioreactors and some kinds of VFAs-producing, denitrifying and aromatic ring opening microorganisms were discovered. Further, the nirK and bcrA genes quantification also indicated the coupling process owned outstanding denitrification and aromatic compound-degrading potential, which demonstrates that the coupling process owns admirable applicability for this kind of wastewater treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据