4.7 Article

Reduced graphene oxide/α-Fe2O3 composite nanofibers for application in gas sensors

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 244, 期 -, 页码 233-242

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.12.137

关键词

rGO; alpha-Fe2O3; Electrospinning; Defects; Acetone

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [61573164, 61520106003, 61503148, 61327804, 61374218, 61134010]
  2. Program for Chang Jiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT13018]
  3. National High -Tech Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2013AA030902, 2014AA06A505]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M580247]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pure alpha-Fe2O3 nanobelts (NBs) and 0.5, 1.0, 3.0 wt% reduced graphene oxide (rGO)/alpha-Fe2O3 composite nanofibers (NFs) have been successfully synthesized by a homotaxial electrospinning method. Various techniques were employed for the characterization of the nanostructures and morphologies of the as obtained nanofibers. The results indicate that pure alpha-Fe2O3 NBs have uniform widths more than 200 nm and series of rGO/alpha-Fe2O3 NFs have diameters approximately 100 nm. In addition, the gas sensing properties of the obtained nanofibers were investigated. It is found that 1 wt% rGO/alpha-Fe2O3 shows high response, excellent repeatability and long-term stability to 100 ppm acetone at the operating temperature of 375 degrees C. The response of 1 wt% rGO/alpha-Fe2O3 nanofibers to 100 ppm acetone is about 8.9, which is about 4.5 times higher than pure a-Fe2O3 NBs. Furthermore, the combination of rGO with alpha-Fe2O3 can also improve the response/recovery properties. The response and recovery times of the sensor were about 3 and 9s, respectively, which were superior to pure alpha-Fe2O3 NBs. Finally, we have proposed that the creation of ohmic contact, defects on the rGO nanosheets surface play significant roles in raising the sensitivity of rGO/alpha-Fe2O3 NFs. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据