4.7 Article

Paper-based laser induced fluorescence immunodevice combining with CdTe embedded silica nanoparticles signal enhancement strategy

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 242, 期 -, 页码 87-94

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.11.004

关键词

Laser induced fluorescence; Paper-based immunodevice; Silica nanoparticle; CdTe quantum dot; Signal enhancement

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21005048]
  2. Shaanxi Province Science Foundation [2015JM2066]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [GK201603049]
  4. Program for Innovative Research Team in Shaanxi Province [2014KCT-28]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Paper-based laser induced fluorescence immunodevice for alpha fetoprotein (AFP) detection was developed in this work by using CdTe quantum dots (QDs) embedded silica nanoparticles as the signal enhancement label. A homemade laser induced fluorescence device with two optical fibres was used here for the fluorescence detection. Laser issued by a semiconductor laser light source (405 nm, 1 mW) was exposed to the paper-based chip with very lower background through an optical fiber and the fluorescence (542 nm) induced by laser was collected to a photomultiplier tube (PMT) through a glass fiber. The paper-based chip was fabricated by the wax-printing method and the antibody can be directly immobilized on the plasma treated paper surface. Then CdTe QDs embedded silica nanoparticles with the signal enhancement function was labeled on the signal antibody. After a sandwich-type immunoreaction, AFP was linearly detected in the range from 0.001 ng/mL to 20:0 ng/mL with a detection limit of 0.4 pg/mL. Laser induced fluorescence with the homemade device was for the first time applied on the paper-based chip with very higher sensitivity. What's more, the proposed strategy opened a promising platform for sensitive monitoring of cancer biomarkers in biological analysis and medical diagnostics. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据