4.7 Article

Bioluminescent detection of the total amount of viable Gram-positive bacteria isolated by vancomycin-functionalized magnetic particles

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 241, 期 -, 页码 255-261

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.10.042

关键词

Bioluminescence; Adenosine triphosphate; Vancomycin; Magnetic particles; Gram-positive bacteria

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21475107]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A facile bioluminescent protocol was developed to detect the total amount of viable Gram-positive bacteria based on a novel antibiotic-affinity strategy. Vancomycin-functionalized magnetic particles were adopted to isolate Gram-positive bacteria from sample matrix, utilizing the five-point hydrogen bonds binding between vancomycin and D-Alanyl-D-Alanine moieties on the cell wall. Then the bioluminescence signal from the bacterial intracellular adenosine triphosphate was collected to quantify the captured bacteria after cells lysis. In this proof-of-principle work, the developed protocol was applied to detect four Gram-positive bacteria, including Staphylococcus aureus, Micrococcus luteus, Bacillus cereus and Streptococcus mutans. It showed a linear range of 1.0 x 10(2)-1.0 x 10(7) CFU mL(-1) and a detection limit of 33 CFU mL(-1) for the four model bacteria. The whole assay process could be completed within 70 min, Gram-negative bacteria and dead bacteria all showed negligible interference to the detection of the viable Gram-positive bacteria. The method was successfully applied to quantify the amount of viable Gram-positive bacteria in environmental, food and pharmaceutical samples with acceptable recovery values ranging from 72.0% to 120.0%. The protocol possessed numerous advantages such as high sensitivity, low cost, ideal specificity and short detection time. It could also be extended to Gram-negative bacteria detection by utilizing other antibiotics acting on Gram-negative bacteria. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据