4.7 Article

Post-synthetic modification of a metal-organic framework with fluorescent-tag for dual naked-eye sensing in aqueous medium

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 239, 期 -, 页码 759-767

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.08.045

关键词

Metal-organic framework; Post-synthetic modification; Fluorescence amplification; Pyrene excimer; Anion sensing; Nitroaromatics sensing

资金

  1. Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), New Delhi [SB/FT/CS-070/2013]
  2. Ministry of Human Resource Development for Center of Excellence in FAST [5-7/2014-TS-VII]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The existing metal-organic framework (MOF) called UiO-66-NH2 (1; UiO = University of Oslo) was post-synthetically modified by condensation with 1-pyrenecarboxaldehyde. The pyrene-tagged MOF (1') exhibited similar to 3-fold enhancement in fluorescence intensity over the un-functionalized one with a new emission peak at 470 nm due to the formation pyrene excimer within the framework of the MOF. 1' showed fast response time, excellent selectivity and sensitivity for sensing of biologically active anions like F- and H2PO4- in pure aqueous medium via fluorescence 'turn-on' mechanism with detection limits of 8.2 x 10(-7)M and 7.3 x 10(-7)M, respectively. The fluorescence enhancement and the distinctive blue shifts in the emission bands of 1' in presence of the anions are attributed to strong hydrogen bonding interactions and static pyrene excimer formation, respectively. 1' also displayed rapid, selective and sensitive detection of 2,4,6-trinitrophenol (TNP) in aqueous medium via fluorescence 'turn-off' mechanism with a detection limit of 2.1 x 10(-7)M. The highly selective fluorescence quenching is ascribed to electron and energy transfer processes as well as molecular interactions (pi-pi and electrostatic) of the MOF with TNP. The excellent detection performance of 1' in aqueous medium makes it a promising dual sensor material for real-field applications. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据