4.7 Article

Synthesis of surface layered hierarchical octahedral-like structured Zn2SnO4/SnO2 with excellent sensing properties toward HCHO

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 243, 期 -, 页码 1171-1180

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.12.110

关键词

Zn2SnO4/SnO2; Hierarchical; Octahedral-like; Formaldehyde; Gas sensor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21471120]
  2. International Cooperation Foundation of Hubei Province [2012IHA00201]
  3. Educational Commission of Hubei Province of China [T201306]
  4. Science & Technology program of Wuhan Science and Technology Bureau [2015060202010121]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An uniform surface layered hierarchical octahedral-like structured Zn2SnO4/SnO2 had been achieved through a simple chemical route with post heat-treatment. The structures of Zn2SnO4/SnO2 composites can be readily tailored from sphere, hierarchical octahedral-like structure to perfect octahedron simply by adjusting the reaction solution temperatures. The as-prepared Zn2SnO4/SnO2 composites were used as sensing materials to detect formaldehyde (HCHO) and other volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Among all the sensors of Zn2SnO4/SnO2, the sensor based on hierarchical octahedral-like Zn2SnO4/SnO2-20 degrees C demonstrated the most excellent response toward HCHO, which presented high sensitivity, wide detection limit, excellent stability/reversibility and distinguished selectivity. Such good sensing performance is mainly ascribed to the unique surface layered hierarchical octahedral-like structure. Zn2SnO4/SnO2-20 degrees C has uniform particles with smaller size and as much as possible exposed surface, resulting in large specific surface area, much active adsorption/interaction sites, narrow mesopore size distribution and proper pore volume which are beneficial to the gas sensing. This work renders a great way to improve the sensing characteristics by using a surface hierarchical structure material. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据