4.7 Article

An electrochemical omeprazole sensor based on shortened multi-walled carbon nanotubes-Fe3O4 nanoparticles and poly(2,6-pyridinedicarboxylic acid)

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 253, 期 -, 页码 1-9

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2017.06.117

关键词

Omeprazole; Shortened multi-walled carbon nanotube; Fe3O4 nanoparticles; Poly (2,6-pyridinedicarboxylic acid)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21471052, 21671063]
  2. Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department [16B088]
  3. Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Theoretical Organic Chemistry and Function Molecule, Ministry of Education [LKF1607]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three types of shortened and acidified multi-walled carbon nanotubes (S-MWCNTs) were synthesized by ultrasonication of the raw long carbon nanotubes in H2SO4/HNO3 mixed acids. A comparative electrochemical investigation was performed in 5 mu M omeprazole (OMZ) solution. It demonstrated that S-MWCNTs with specific length and acidity showed higher electrocatalysis to the oxidation of OMZ. Magnetite nanoparticles Fe3O4 were hybridized with S-MWCNTs to form a nanohybrid (S-MWCNTs-Fe3O4) through a simple, effective and reproducible chemical co-precipitation method. The nanohybridwas characterized by transmission electron microscope (TEM), X-ray diffractometer (XRD), thermogravimetric analyses (TGA), and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). The electrochemicalresponse characteristic of S-MWCNTs-Fe3O4 modified GCE toward OMZ was investigated by cyclicvoltammetry. It showed that the nanohybrid enhanced the electrocatalytic oxidation to OMZ. Linear sweep voltametry (LSV) was applied to determine low concentrations of OMZ on S-MWCNTs-Fe3O4/poly(2,6-pyridinedicarboxylic acid) modified electrode. A linear relationship was found between peak currents (i(p,a)) and the concentration of OMZ within 0.05-9.0 mu M with an estimated detection limit of 15 nM. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据