3.9 Article

Factors affecting the concussion knowledge of athletes, parents, coaches, and medical professionals

期刊

SAGE OPEN MEDICINE
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/2050312117699799

关键词

Concussion; traumatic brain injury; sports; knowledge; public health; prevention

资金

  1. Public Health Agency of Canada
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Strategic Team Grant in Applied Injury Research [TIR-103946]
  3. Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To determine the predictors of knowledge and awareness of concussion symptoms and outcomes through a survey of athletes, parents of players and coaches in sports settings in Canada. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of athletic communities in Canada was conducted. Respondents' concussion knowledge score consists of responses to questions about the symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment of a concussion and the timing of return-to-sport post-concussion. The percentage of correct responses was defined as the identification rate. The extent to which participant factors affected the scores was examined by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Respondents were able to identify a mean of 80.6% of symptoms. Cognitive symptoms were most commonly known, and mental health symptoms associated with concussion were least known, and health professionals, coaches, and those with a personal history of concussion had the highest levels of overall knowledge. Language, age, educational level, annual household income, and traumatic brain injury history were good predictors of better concussion knowledge. Conclusion: Those designing and implementing interventions aimed at concussion management and prevention should ensure that younger, lower income, lower educational, non-English-speaking persons, and those without experience of traumatic brain injury or concussion be specifically accounted for in the design and implementation of interventions to prevent and treat concussion and mild traumatic brain injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据