4.6 Review

A Review of Passive RFID Tag Antenna-Based Sensors and Systems for Structural Health Monitoring Applications

期刊

SENSORS
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s17020265

关键词

structural health monitoring (SHM); radio frequency identification (RFID); passive sensors; antenna; strain; crack; corrosion

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/J012343/1]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J012343/1, EP/E005071/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. EPSRC [EP/E005071/1, EP/J012343/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent few years, the antenna and sensor communities have witnessed a considerable integration of radio frequency identification (RFID) tag antennas and sensors because of the impetus provided by internet of things (IoT) and cyber-physical systems (CPS). Such types of sensor can find potential applications in structural health monitoring (SHM) because of their passive, wireless, simple, compact size, and multimodal nature, particular in large scale infrastructures during their lifecycle. The big data from these ubiquitous sensors are expected to generate a big impact for intelligent monitoring. A remarkable number of scientific papers demonstrate the possibility that objects can be remotely tracked and intelligently monitored for their physical/chemical/mechanical properties and environment conditions. Most of the work focuses on antenna design, and significant information has been generated to demonstrate feasibilities. Further information is needed to gain deep understanding of the passive RFID antenna sensor systems in order to make them reliable and practical. Nevertheless, this information is scattered over much literature. This paper is to comprehensively summarize and clearly highlight the challenges and state-of-the-art methods of passive RFID antenna sensors and systems in terms of sensing and communication from system point of view. Future trends are also discussed. The future research and development in UK are suggested as well.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据