4.6 Article

Analysis of Optimal Sensor Positions for Activity Classification and Application on a Different Data Collection Scenario

期刊

SENSORS
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s17040774

关键词

activity classification; activity monitoring; wearable sensors; sensor positions

资金

  1. Thailand Research Fund (TRF), under the Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program [PHD/0247/2552]
  2. National Research University Project - Thailand Office of Higher Education Commission
  3. Centre of Excellence in Intelligent Informatics, Speech and Language Technology and Service Innovation (CILS), Thammasat University
  4. Anandamahidol Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper focuses on optimal sensor positioning for monitoring activities of daily living and investigates different combinations of features and models on different sensor positions, i.e., the side of the waist, front of the waist, chest, thigh, head, upper arm, wrist, and ankle. Nineteen features are extracted, and the feature importance is measured by using the Relief-F feature selection algorithm. Eight classification algorithms are evaluated on a dataset collected from young subjects and a dataset collected from elderly subjects, with two different experimental settings. To deal with different sampling rates, signals with a high data rate are down-sampled and a transformation matrix is used for aligning signals to the same coordinate system. The thigh, chest, side of the waist, and front of the waist are the best four sensor positions for the first dataset (young subjects), with average accuracy values greater than 96%. The best model obtained from the first dataset for the side of the waist is validated on the second dataset (elderly subjects). The most appropriate number of features for each sensor position is reported. The results provide a reference for building activity recognition models for different sensor positions, as well as for data acquired from different hardware platforms and subject groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据