4.6 Review

Ground Penetrating Radar as a Contextual Sensor for Multi-Sensor Radiological Characterisation

期刊

SENSORS
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s17040790

关键词

ground-penetrating radar; radiological characterisation and multi-sensor data fusion

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), U.K. [EP/N509231/1]
  2. Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, U.K.
  3. EPSRC [1787125] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1787125] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Radioactive sources exist in environments or contexts that influence how they are detected and localised. For instance, the context of a moving source is different from a stationary source because of the effects of motion. The need to incorporate this contextual information in the radiation detection and localisation process has necessitated the integration of radiological and contextual sensors. The benefits of the successful integration of both types of sensors is well known and widely reported in fields such as medical imaging. However, the integration of both types of sensors has also led to innovative solutions to challenges in characterising radioactive sources in non-medical applications. This paper presents a review of such recent applications. It also identifies that these applications mostly use visual sensors as contextual sensors for characterising radiation sources. However, visual sensors cannot retrieve contextual information about radioactive wastes located in opaque environments encountered at nuclear sites, e. g., underground contamination. Consequently, this paper also examines ground-penetrating radar (GPR) as a contextual sensor for characterising this category of wastes and proposes several ways of integrating data from GPR and radiological sensors. Finally, it demonstrates combined GPR and radiation imaging for three-dimensional localisation of contamination in underground pipes using radiation transport and GPR simulations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据